I ran across this article on BankRate.com and found the presentation of the statistics incredibly clear and well formulated. Many times the “sensationalism” of the facts send panic waves throughout the public. Don’t get me wrong, I am not playing down the fact that it appears many families may not be able to afford their homes in the near future. In fact it sickens me to think that many of those families may have been misguided by individuals in my industry or another “Real Estate Professional”. One can only hope that those greedy and unscrupulous individuals are part of the estimated 40%-60% mortgage professionals out of a job!

Just how bad is the housing market?  In a nutshell, as depicted by Marcie Geffner’s article:

Foreclosures are up. House prices are down. Mortgages may be toxic.  Should you be worried about your own situation?

The current trends, which include significant jumps in the numbers of foreclosures and overdue mortgage payments, certainly aren’t pretty, though finding accurate and useful numbers is a challenge.

• More than 1.28 million properties were the subject of some 2.2 million foreclosure notices in 2007 according to RealtyTrac, an online marketplace for foreclosure properties. Those filings affected only 1 percent of the nation’s households, but the 2007 total increased a whopping 79 percent compared with 2006.
• Loan delinquencies also rose steadily throughout 2006 and 2007, according to LoanPerformance, a unit of First American CoreLogic. In November 2007, the most recent month for which data were available, more than 25 percent of borrowers who had a subprime interest-only, payment-option or negative amortization type of loan were more than 60 days late on their payments. More than 21 percent of borrowers who had a traditional 30-year fixed-rate or similar type of subprime loan were more than 60 days late as well. Not all”60-day lates” result in foreclosure, but overdue payments certainly suggest homeowners are overextended.
• Moreover, historical comparisons suggest that today’s situation is significantly worse in some respects than the problems that were experienced during in the last housing downturn. From August 2002 to September 2004, less than 1 percent of nontraditional subprime loans were more than 60 days delinquent, in large part because cash-strapped homeowners could more easily sell their properties. But even back in the first seven months of 1999, that figure climbed “only” 14 percent to 18 percent — high indeed, but still significantly lower than the recent trend line.

These scary-sounding statistics don’t tell the whole story, however.  Foreclosures are a small share of households.

• Nationally, even 1.2 million foreclosures, if that many occurred, would represent less than 1 percent of U.S. households, which number approximately 128 million, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

More than 60 percent of households didn’t have a mortgage in the year 2000, also according to the Census Bureau. Of those, 35 million were mortgage less because they were renters; another 26 million owned their own home outright. None of those folks were in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure.

• Another potentially worrisome figure is the number of adjustable-rate mortgages that are expected to reset to higher payments, which may be unaffordable for those borrowers, in 2008 and 2009.  Approximately 51 million mortgages were outstanding in the United States at the end of 2006, again according to the Census Bureau. LoanPerformance recently tracked approximately 5 million ARMs, and found that 1.3 million, or 35 percent, of the 3.7 million prime ARMs, and 2 million, or 92 percent, of the 2.1 million subprime ARMs were scheduled to reset this year or next year. That 92 percent sounds like a big number, but the total number of ARM resets amounts to only 3.3 million loans, or 2.6 percent of U.S. households.